Showing posts with label US Foreign Policy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label US Foreign Policy. Show all posts

Jul 14, 2011

“Invest In U.S. Global Leadership”: Former Members Of Congress


Despite having different political opinions, former members of Congress, Tom Daschle and Tom Ridge agree on one fact: when it comes to the issue of America’s security and prosperity, there is no alternative of continued engagement and U.S. leadership around the world. They also stated that, making disproportionate cuts to U.S. investments in diplomacy and international development would be a serious mistake especially in time like this.

In answering the question, how investment in global partnership can help U.S. economy, the former members pointed out that, increasing America’s share of exports will require substantial investments in programs that forge international partnerships, open new markets and help develop local environment where U.S. products and services can be sold successfully. The 1% international affairs budget can do just that.

Over the past 40 years, U.S. trade has tripled as a share of national economy, and nearly half of all U.S. exports now go to the developing world. The authors quoted Tom Donohue, president and chief executive officer of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, “95 percent of the people we want to sell something to live somewhere other than the United States.” Not only that a majority of the 500 largest companies currently receive more than half their revenues from foreign sales.

Not only economic reasons, but also the national security reason emphasizes the importance of U.S. investment in diplomacy which is why prominent military leaders like former Defense Secretary Robert Gates, are such strong advocates for the full funding of the international affairs budget. The former Congressmen underscore the significance of the initiative, “Impact 2012: Building a Better, Safer World, a nonpartisan education effort that calls on candidates of both parties to commit to protecting and strengthening U.S. strategic investments in development and diplomacy. After all, when it comes to the point where country’s security and prosperity are at stake, every other issue just falls short.

-Nisha Noor

SOURCE: POLITICO

Jul 12, 2011

Obama Defends US Foreign Aid In Twitter Town Hall Meeting




In the much anticipated Twitter Town Hall Meeting on Wednesday, July 7, President Barack Obama defended US foreign aid saying that this tiny amount can have a big impact on US foreign policy. When Twitter users were calling for trimming overseas help, President Obama said, “It’s something that, even in tough fiscal times, American needs to continue to do as part of our role as a global leader,”

Various opinion polls have found that the US public estimates foreign aid to be 20% of overall discretionary spending whereas in reality this amount is only 2% (1% if narrowly defined) of annual budget.

The President also said, “America, to be a leader in the world, to have influence, to help stabilize countries and create opportunity for people so that they don’t breed terrorists or create huge refugee flows and so forth — it’s smart for us to make a very modest investment in foreign aid.”

My unsent Twit to the President: let the 2% (if not more) aid flow and make a difference in the world.

-Nisha Noor

SOURCE: THE EXPRESS TRIBUNE

Jun 17, 2011

Human Rights Council Improves With US Involvement


US contributions to the United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC) are under attack in congress despite the fact that US engagement has been proven to be beneficial and effective, as stated by a top State Department Official on Wednesday.

"UN bodies, including the HRC, have improved as a result of direct US engagement. If we cede ground, if our engagement in the UN system is restricted -- these bodies will likely be dominated by our adversaries," stressed Esther Brimmer, the assistant secretary of State for International Organization Affairs.

Before the US became involved, Israel was being singled out for actions of condemnation, while other countries that were home to the world's worst human rights abuses were being ignored. Now the situation is much more balanced. Though there remain challenges, the improvement through US engagement is "undeniable."

Highlighted is the councils decision on Wednesday in reaction to the Syrian government. Syria was requested to allow access to the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and referred to "daily reports of killings, detentions and torture o men, women and children." Syria actually dropped its bid for a seat on the council as a result of the pressure. The Council also suspended Libya in March.

Brimmer has criticized the congressional efforts to limit US funding for the United Nations. The effort to withhold engagement is led by the House of Foreign Affairs Committee Chairwoman Lleana Ros-lehtinen.

Brimmer argues that the US maintain the strongest position it can in the UN. "How else could we have won tough Security Council sanctions on Iran or North Korea if we were continuing to incur arrears?" she asks.

The US cannot afford failed short term tactics. If the US approaches the situation in this way there will be long-term implications for overall security.

As stated by Brimmer, "We must be a responsible global leader."

-Gabrielle Gurian

SOURCE: FOREIGNPOLICY.COM


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...